'Funny Girl' retools and leans into the drama

Plus: Talking Emmy nominations, the 'Before' trilogy, and what's making us happy!

View this email online by Linda Holmes Welcome! It was the week when we learned a little about who's coming to Black Mirror. It was the week when the Emmys made two old pals into mortal enemies. And it was the week when Metallica had no patience for anybody's griping about who was a "real" fan. Let's get to it. Opening Argument: Funny Girl retools and leans into the drama Not everybody follows Broadway gossip. But for people who do, the unraveling of the current revival of the musical Funny Girl has been a big deal.  The short version: Beanie Feldstein was cast as Fanny Brice, and the show opened in late April. The reviews were bad. Meanwhile, Lea Michele, both during her time on Glee and at other times, had made clear her eagerness to play Fanny. After it was announced that Feldstein would leave the show in September, but before any official public naming of a successor, Gawker published a piece on June 30 breaking the news that Lea Michele would, at last, get the role she pursued for so long, replacing Feldstein. The producers later confirmed it.  Any effort to cast this as an uplifting dream-come-true story for Michele, however, is complicated (to say the least) by the fact that she has been accused of appalling on-set behavior by some of the people she worked with on Glee, including Samantha Ware, who said Michele's "traumatic microaggressions" made her question her whole career, and who said, apparently in response to Michele's casting in Funny Girl: "Yes, Broadway upholds whiteness. Yes, Hollywood does the same."  This week, The Daily Beast published what is mostly a single anonymous "senior show source" account of what transpired, part a tale and part a commentary. It's all very soapy and scandalous, all about hurt feelings and terrible communication. (It also glides extremely quickly over the allegations against Michele.) There's other gossip: that Feldstein and Michele have the same theater agent (!), that everyone is very concerned about Feldstein's feelings, that everyone has tiptoed around her to their (and her) detriment. But the theme that comes through loud and clear is framing the debate around whose fault it is that they didn't replace Feldstein sooner. It is genuinely amazing how successful the effort has been, across the board, to lay the entire blame for a panned production's failure at the feet of one performer, the better to entice audiences back by replacing her. Evan Agostini, Greg Allen/Invision It's not much remembered anymore, and it isn't making it into many of the current stories about the situation, but the reviews of this revival, while they most definitely were critical of her performance, did not say Feldstein was terrible and everything else was terrific. This is what S.S. Source would like you to believe – that they just needed to swap out the leading lady immediately and all would have been well. Consider the actual reviews at issue: Jesse Green in The New York Times said that Feldstein, while not "stupendous," as the role requires, was "good." Faint praise, of course, but if you doubt he meant to convey that it wasn't fair to blame her for the show's problems, consider that he said, "You can't blame Feldstein for the show's problems; that would be like blaming the clown for the elephants." (S.S. Source blames her, or at least the failure to immediately fire her, for the show's problems.) Green criticized the book, he criticized the staging in general, and he criticized the sets in particular. Adam Feldman said in Time Out New York that Feldstein wasn't up to the role, but he also said the other performances were bad, the direction was wobbly, and the book didn't work. Frank Rizzo in Variety said some of Feldstein's numbers came off well and some didn't, but – here's this problem again – he said the book of the show just doesn't work, and he also didn't like the sets or the costumes.  These reviews didn't suggest to me that they just needed to dump Beanie Feldstein real quick and keep going. They also didn't suggest the show wasn't failing. What they suggested to me is that everyone involved needed to put this effort down, give it a dignified closing, and accept that not everything works out and that everybody who didn't revive Funny Girl for decades (partly for the lack of an available substitute for Barbra Streisand) was probably right.  But – and admittedly, my cynicism is creeping in here – nobody wants to do that! It is much better for the producers and the show's financial future for the issue to be narrowed to one actor, so that if you replace her – particularly with lots and lots and lots of fanfare and attention, which you get when you make recasting a role all about a problematic try-hard having a triumph over a woman who stopped being warm and friendly enough – it seems like a full solution. "Oh, thank goodness," we are all encouraged to think, "they fixed what was wrong with the Funny Girl revival. I must buy a ticket!" It's so easy to get an incomplete narrative to take off when it's all about drama between and among women, it's almost ... well, funny.  Did they fix any of the other things critics complained about? I don't really know. Like most people who are following all this, I haven't seen the show, but I know what I read, and I am precisely the kind of person they would like to persuade to come see the show post-replacement. But why would I? The consensus about Feldstein was that you practically have to be Barbra Streisand to pull this off, and she isn't Barbra Streisand. But that doesn't mean Lea Michele is Barbra Streisand. Even if Michele has the singing voice Feldstein lacks and the ability to perform Funny Girl songs in concert, it's entirely possible she will turn out to lack some of the comedy chops and the flirty charm that some critics noted Feldstein did have, which the role also needs.  Productions are complicated. I was recently reminded that Ethan Hawke's Broadway debut was in a 1992 production of The Seagull that also starred Laura Linney among others, and that was critically walloped. Things happen; talented people flop. Circumstances let you down, choices you didn't make let you down, choices you did make let you down, dreams do not materialize. It is alchemy, creating things, and that is what makes it special and terrible and scary and delightful. Much of the drama of Broadway, and of theater, and of creative people in general is not narrowing in on who's to blame. It's respecting the vexing, mysterious, sometimes unpredictable ways in which things work or don't work. At any rate, one of the things S.S. Source says in the Daily Beast piece is that it will be important to get the show "re-reviewed." Now that will be interesting.  Newsletter continues after sponsor message We Recommend We talked a few weeks ago about the exceptionally good show This Is Going To Hurt, which stars Ben Whishaw as a struggling young OB/GYN in a National Health Service hospital in London. The episodes are all available now on AMC+ or Sundance Now, and I've had a few people reach out to me to say how impressed they've been with it and how glad they are that we helped guide them to it – while expressing frustration that because it's not on one of the bigger services, they don't have that many people to talk about it with. Which is all my way of saying: Grabbing one of those services, even for just a month, to binge this particular show might be as good an expenditure of your money as any movie ticket. I'm just saying.  It's a good time to catch up on some of the people who got Emmy nominations, as well as some of the people who made news for not getting them – because either way, it's work somebody likes. Can I recommend you catch up on some great shows and then their accompanying PCHH episodes, like maybe Severance, Reservation Dogs, Yellowjackets, Pachinko or Abbott Elementary? I want you to know that the Before trilogy – Before Sunrise, Before Sunset and Before Midnight – are all currently available on the Criterion Channel, and I recommend them vigorously. If you like, you could even read the piece I wrote about them years ago.  A note: We're going to be talking about The Wire on an upcoming episode, and we'd love to hear your questions. What should we talk about? Send us your questions in a voice memo to pchh@npr.org.  What We Did This Week FX I wrote about the Ryan Gosling/Chris Evans action movie The Gray Man. It was complicated. Glen talked to Bedatri D. Choudhury about the action film RRR. Glen and Aisha chatted with Kat Chow about the kitchen drama of The Bear. Aisha and I talked about the Emmy nominations and what we were most excited to see recognized. I also talked about the nods with Ailsa Chang on All Things Considered. Stephen dug into some deeper cuts of BTS with Lenika Cruz and Regina Kim. And Stephen talked to Barrie Hardymon and Greta Johnsen about the new film based on the very big book, Where The Crawdads Sing. For All Things Considered on the weekend, I highlighted some of the "Book Club Ideas" entries that made it into the summer edition of NPR's Books We Love. What's Making Us Happy Every week on the show, we talk about some other things out in the world that have been giving us joy lately. Here they are: What's making Greta happy: For All Mankind What's making Barrie happy: The Witcher What's making Stephen happy: BeReal Listen to your local NPR station. Visit NPR.org to hear live radio from WMFE (edit station). Subscribe to Pop Culture Happy Hour+. Your support helps make our show possible and unlocks access to our sponsor-free episodes. What do you think of today's email? We'd love to hear your thoughts, questions and feedback: pchh@npr.org Enjoying this newsletter? Forward to a friend! They can sign up here. Looking for more great content? Check out all of our newsletter offerings — including Music, Books, Daily News and more! You received this message because you're subscribed to Pop Culture Happy Hour emails. This email was sent by National Public Radio, Inc., 1111 North Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20002 Unsubscribe  |  Privacy Policy